- Short answer: Integrate validated behaviour-change models (like COM-B, Behaviour Change Wheel, or Transtheoretical Model) into service design by using them to identify barriers, shape interventions, and define measurable outcomes. Embed model-informed steps into user journeys, staff workflows, and evaluation loops so services actively support desired behaviours.
- Key terms
- COM-B — capability, opportunity, motivation model of behaviour.
- Intervention function — ways a service can change behaviour (e.g., education, incentives).
- User journey — sequence of user interactions with a service.
- Behavioural outcome — specific action the service aims to change.
- How it works
- Map target behaviour and users using a model (e.g., identify lacking capability/opportunity/motivation).
- Design service touchpoints to deliver appropriate intervention functions (reminders, feedback, incentives).
- Build processes and staff roles to sustain interventions (training, prompts).
- Measure intermediate outcomes (engagement, capability) and final behavioural outcomes.
- Iterate using data and qualitative feedback.
- Simple example
- A healthcare appointment system adds capability (how-to reminders), opportunity (easier booking), and motivation (feedback on benefits) to increase attendance.
- Pitfalls or nuances
- Models help guide, not guarantee — local context and equity matter.
- Overloading users with interventions can backfire; test incrementally.
- Next questions to explore
- Which model fits my target behaviour and context?
- What measurable indicators will show change?
- Further reading / references
- The Behaviour Change Wheel — Michie, van Stralen & West (paper/book) (search: "Behaviour Change Wheel Michie 2011")
- COM-B model overview — UK Behavioural Insights Team (search: "COM-B model explanation")