Reader

When people deliberate in group contexts, for example in the context of a citizens assembly, they encounter new information (their epistemic

Current node Origin

When people deliberate in group contexts, for example in the context of a citizens assembly, they encounter new information (their epistemic position changes) but in many cases their evaluations of outcomes may change too, and by extension we may see shifts in their value landscapes. Under what circumstances is it a good thing when deliberative processes produce changes in the value landscape of deliberators?

This point splits the conversation. Pick the direction you want to read next.

The Alchemical Crucible: When Value Shifts Validate Deliberative Democracy

What if the greatest value of democratic deliberation is not that it helps us get what we want, but that it changes who we are? Political th

What about the work of, for example, Sarah Stein Lubrano who talks about the fac...

This path eventually reaches Epistemic Proceduralism and Democratic Reason: Peter and Landemore.

Reading key

Select text to save it here.