Inspired by the Philosophy Now article "A Memetic Analysis of Narratives & Conspiracies" by Ignacio Gonzalez. Why do some narratives spread
Narratives absorb the propositional contents of their constitutive talking-point-memes and turn them into an overarching claim suffused with moral undertones. This is by design, since in order to have a chance of thriving in a culture, narratives depend on their capacity to hijack our motivations. To do this, a narrative could hardly do better than to latch on to our propensity to pontificate.
Select text to highlight passages.
Beyond the Pulpit: Why Moralizing is Not the Engine of Narrative Survival
No source links recorded for this answer.
Are "urban myths" legitimate examples of narratives, or, is it wiser to limit the category of "narrative" to those assemblages of talking points that boil down to a defense of a proposition that contains a value judgment at its core, one which could be made to fit in a these-events-are-justified/right/good mould?
Select text to highlight passages.
The Tyranny of the Moral: Why Narratives Transcend Value Judgments
No source links recorded for this answer.
The Narrative Engine: Synthesizing Cognitive Maps and Moral Crusades
No source links recorded for this answer.
Continue this thread
This path ends here for now.
Share your perspective, offer an example, or ask a follow-up to continue the discussion.
Other paths you could read
Earlier, at Are "urban myths" legitimate examples of narratives, or, is it wiser to limit th..., the conversation split. If this is not the thread you want, you can switch to the other path below.
Highlights
35 saved passages and connected ideas
Connected ideas
Connected ideas