how to define succes

Workspace actions
Starting question

how to define succes

Then AI response

What Counts as Success?

No source links recorded for this answer.

“Success” is not a single thing but a family of ideas. How you define it depends on your values, aims, and the standards you accept. Below are concise philosophical perspectives and a short practical method to form your own definition. Philosophical perspectives - Eudaimonic (flourishing): Success = living well and realizing your human capacities (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics). - Hedonic/welfare: Success = maximizing pleasure or well‑being and minimizing suffering (classical utilitarianism; Mill). - Virtue/character: Success = cultivating moral and intellectual virtues and acting rightly (virtue ethics). - Existential/authenticity: Success = choosing freely, taking responsibility, and living authentically in accordance with self‑created meaning (Sartre; Frankl on meaning). - Social/relational: Success = contributing to others and sustaining meaningful relationships (care ethics, capability approach — Sen). Practical way to define your personal success 1. Name core values (e.g., autonomy, connection, mastery, contribution). 2. Translate each value into specific outcomes or capacities (what would it look like if realized?). 3. Choose measurable indicators and time frames (SMART where helpful). 4. Weigh trade‑offs explicitly (which values can be sacrificed, which are non‑negotiable). 5. Revisit and revise periodically; life circumstances change what’s reasonable or desirable. Common pitfalls - Adopting others’ metrics (status, wealth) without reflection. - Narrow short‑term wins that harm long‑term flourishing. - Equating success only with external recognition. Example succinct definitions - “Success = sustained personal growth and contributing to others’ well‑being.” - “Success = meeting my chosen goals while living by my core values.” References (select) - Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. - John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism. - Viktor E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning. - Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism Is a Humanism. - Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (capability approach). If you want, tell me two values you care about and I’ll help craft a short, personalized definition of success.

Select text to highlight passages.

Then Thought · Participant

Explain: Narrow short‑term wins that harm long‑term flourishing.

Select text to highlight passages.

Then AI response

How “Narrow Short‑Term Wins That Harm Long‑Term Flourishing” Works

No source links recorded for this answer.

Meaning in one line - It refers to pursuing immediate, limited gains (a promotion, quick profit, a public accolade, short-lived pleasure) in ways that reduce your capacity to flourish over time (health, character, relationships, freedom, meaning). Why this is a problem (mechanisms) - Present bias / hyperbolic discounting: we overweight immediate rewards relative to future ones, so short wins look disproportionately attractive (behavioral econ: Laibson). - Misplaced metrics: treating narrow indicators (salary, likes, test scores) as the whole goal ignores broader goods that constitute flourishing (instrumental vs. intrinsic goods). - Opportunity costs and path dependence: time, energy, and habits spent on short wins block alternatives that build long‑term capacities. - Hedonic treadmill: short pleasures are quickly adapted to, prompting escalating pursuit without added flourishing (Kahneman). - Erosion of capacities: repeated short‑term tradeoffs (sleep loss, cutting relationships, ethical compromises) degrade the faculties needed for sustained well‑being (character, health, social trust). Concrete examples - Taking excessive overtime for a raise, then burning out and losing long‑term career prospects and health. - Chasing social media validation (likes, followers) while neglecting deep friendships. - Choosing immediate consumption (status goods on credit) that creates long-term debt and insecurity. - Shortcutting learning to get credentials rather than mastering skills — later stagnation. - Crash diets that yield quick weight loss but impair metabolism and long‑term health. How to avoid it (practical moves) - Clarify long‑term values/ends (what counts as flourishing for you). - Use long‑horizon indicators (health metrics, relationship quality, skill mastery) alongside short metrics. - Precommit and create friction for tempting short wins (e.g., autopilot savings, limited work hours). - Weigh opportunity costs explicitly before choices: what will this preclude later? - Build habits and non‑negotiables that protect capacities (sleep, exercise, time with loved ones). - Regularly review and recalibrate goals as circumstances change. Philosophical note - Aristotle’s idea of eudaimonia emphasizes sustained activity in pursuit of human excellences; short, narrow wins can be means rather than constitutive of flourishing (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics). Select references - Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. - David Laibson, “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting” (1997). - Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011). If you want, give one short-term win you’re tempted by and one long-term value you care about; I’ll help map the trade‑offs and a simple safeguard.

Select text to highlight passages.

Continue this thread

This path ends here for now.

Share your perspective, offer an example, or ask a follow-up to continue the discussion.

Other paths you could read

Earlier, at What Counts as Success?, the conversation split. If this is not the thread you want, you can switch to one of the other paths below.

User Comment

Explain: Eudaimonic (flourishing): Success = living well and realizing your human capacities (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Hedonic/welfare: Success = maximizing pleasure or well‑being and minimizing suffering (classical utilitarianism; Mill).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Virtue/character: Success = cultivating moral and intellectual virtues and acting rightly (virtue ethics).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Existential/authenticity: Success = choosing freely, taking responsibility, and living authentically in accordance with self‑created meaning (Sartre; Frankl on meaning).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Social/relational: Success = contributing to others and sustaining meaningful relationships (care ethics, capability approach — Sen).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Name core values (e.g., autonomy, connection, mastery, contribution).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Translate each value into specific outcomes or capacities (what would it look like if realized?).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Choose measurable indicators and time frames (SMART where helpful).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Weigh trade‑offs explicitly (which values can be sacrificed, which are non‑negotiable).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Revisit and revise periodically; life circumstances change what’s reasonable or desirable.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Adopting others’ metrics (status, wealth) without reflection.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Equating success only with external recognition.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: “Success = sustained personal growth and contributing to others’ well‑being.”

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: “Success = meeting my chosen goals while living by my core values.”

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Viktor E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism Is a Humanism.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (capability approach).

Read this path

Highlights

0 saved passages and connected ideas

No highlights yet

Select text to save it here.