how to define succes

Workspace actions
Starting question

how to define succes

Then AI response

What Counts as Success?

No source links recorded for this answer.

“Success” is not a single thing but a family of ideas. How you define it depends on your values, aims, and the standards you accept. Below are concise philosophical perspectives and a short practical method to form your own definition. Philosophical perspectives - Eudaimonic (flourishing): Success = living well and realizing your human capacities (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics). - Hedonic/welfare: Success = maximizing pleasure or well‑being and minimizing suffering (classical utilitarianism; Mill). - Virtue/character: Success = cultivating moral and intellectual virtues and acting rightly (virtue ethics). - Existential/authenticity: Success = choosing freely, taking responsibility, and living authentically in accordance with self‑created meaning (Sartre; Frankl on meaning). - Social/relational: Success = contributing to others and sustaining meaningful relationships (care ethics, capability approach — Sen). Practical way to define your personal success 1. Name core values (e.g., autonomy, connection, mastery, contribution). 2. Translate each value into specific outcomes or capacities (what would it look like if realized?). 3. Choose measurable indicators and time frames (SMART where helpful). 4. Weigh trade‑offs explicitly (which values can be sacrificed, which are non‑negotiable). 5. Revisit and revise periodically; life circumstances change what’s reasonable or desirable. Common pitfalls - Adopting others’ metrics (status, wealth) without reflection. - Narrow short‑term wins that harm long‑term flourishing. - Equating success only with external recognition. Example succinct definitions - “Success = sustained personal growth and contributing to others’ well‑being.” - “Success = meeting my chosen goals while living by my core values.” References (select) - Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. - John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism. - Viktor E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning. - Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism Is a Humanism. - Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (capability approach). If you want, tell me two values you care about and I’ll help craft a short, personalized definition of success.

Select text to highlight passages.

Then Thought · Participant

Explain: Viktor E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning.

Select text to highlight passages.

Then AI response

Viktor E. Frankl — Man’s Search for Meaning: Key ideas

No source links recorded for this answer.

Context - Written from Frankl’s experience as a Nazi concentration-camp survivor, Man’s Search for Meaning (first published 1946) blends memoir, existential reflection, and a therapeutic program called logotherapy. Main thesis - The primary human drive is the “will to meaning”: people seek a sense of purpose or intelligibility in their lives. When meaning is found, people can endure great suffering; when it is absent, pathology (despair, neurosis) follows. Core concepts - Logotherapy: a form of psychotherapy focused on helping clients discover meaningful aims (not merely reducing symptoms). It emphasizes responsibility: one must respond to life’s tasks. - Three avenues to meaning: (1) creative work or deeds (what you give to the world); (2) experiential values—beauty, love, encounter with truth (what you receive from the world); (3) attitudinal values—the stance you take toward unavoidable suffering (the meaning you can derive from how you bear hardship). - Freedom of attitude: even when external freedom is constrained, humans retain the inner freedom to choose their attitude and thereby find meaning. - Meaning is concrete and specific: it is discovered in particular duties, relationships, projects—not in abstract formulas. It can change over time. Illustrative claim - “Those who have a ‘why’ to live can bear with almost any ‘how’.” (often quoted from Frankl) Implications for defining success - Success, on Frankl’s view, is less about pleasure or status and more about responding responsibly to the demands of one’s situation—fulfilling tasks that render life meaningful, even in hardship. - Measuring success thus involves asking: What does my life call me to do? How do my actions align with that call? Critiques and support - Criticisms: some see Frankl’s evidence as anecdotal, the theory as under-specified for empirical testing, and the emphasis on meaning as potentially blaming victims who suffer. - Support: contemporary research links perceived meaning with resilience, mental health, and well‑being (see reviews in psychology literature). Practical takeaways - Ask concrete questions: What responsibilities or projects would make my life feel meaningful? What relationships or experiences matter most? How could a change of attitude alter how I bear unavoidable difficulties? - Treat meaning as something to discover in actions, relationships, and responses—not merely as a private feeling. Primary reference - Frankl, V. E. (1946/1959). Man’s Search for Meaning. (Multiple editions; see most recent translation/edition for editorial notes.) If you’d like, give two situations or values you care about and I’ll suggest how Frankl’s approach helps turn them into a practical, meaning‑focused definition of success.

Select text to highlight passages.

Continue this thread

This path ends here for now.

Share your perspective, offer an example, or ask a follow-up to continue the discussion.

Other paths you could read

Earlier, at What Counts as Success?, the conversation split. If this is not the thread you want, you can switch to one of the other paths below.

User Comment

Explain: Eudaimonic (flourishing): Success = living well and realizing your human capacities (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Hedonic/welfare: Success = maximizing pleasure or well‑being and minimizing suffering (classical utilitarianism; Mill).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Virtue/character: Success = cultivating moral and intellectual virtues and acting rightly (virtue ethics).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Existential/authenticity: Success = choosing freely, taking responsibility, and living authentically in accordance with self‑created meaning (Sartre; Frankl on meaning).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Social/relational: Success = contributing to others and sustaining meaningful relationships (care ethics, capability approach — Sen).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Name core values (e.g., autonomy, connection, mastery, contribution).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Translate each value into specific outcomes or capacities (what would it look like if realized?).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Choose measurable indicators and time frames (SMART where helpful).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Weigh trade‑offs explicitly (which values can be sacrificed, which are non‑negotiable).

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Revisit and revise periodically; life circumstances change what’s reasonable or desirable.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Adopting others’ metrics (status, wealth) without reflection.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Narrow short‑term wins that harm long‑term flourishing.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Equating success only with external recognition.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: “Success = sustained personal growth and contributing to others’ well‑being.”

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: “Success = meeting my chosen goals while living by my core values.”

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism Is a Humanism.

Read this path
User Comment

Explain: Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (capability approach).

Read this path

Highlights

0 saved passages and connected ideas

No highlights yet

Select text to save it here.